Click to go to Forum Home Click to go to maXbimmer Home

Go Back   maXbimmer Forums > General > General Discussion
User Name

Welcome to!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-15-2004, 08:25 AM   #61
6th Gear Member
moerom's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Thornhill
Posts: 1,596


You guys actually think I would take a Cobra over an M3?

You're crazy!

Alpine White M3 w/ 19, 6 spd w/ Imola interior!!

Cobra is nice and fast, but the M3 is artwork
moerom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 12:12 PM   #62
Jon@Bimmersport's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 13,554
Originally posted by moerom

You guys actually think I would take a Cobra over an M3?

You're crazy!

Alpine White M3 w/ 19, 6 spd w/ Imola interior!!

Cobra is nice and fast, but the M3 is artwork

M3 over SVT for sure right here....

wat good is a 10sec SVT, when ur handling goes down the drain to make it 10sec...

M3 with RMS is what im talkin bout..right M3NTALM3?

Authorized Ontario dealer for Active Autowerke|VF-Engineering|[/color]ESS TuningAFE|Bilstein Suspension|H&R Suspension|KW suspension|Brembo Brake Systems| Stoptech| - Call us for the best pricing please DO NOT PM in regards to pricing

Maintenance|Performance|Tuning & Forced Induction
Jon@Bimmersport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 02:28 PM   #63
GR8 Ride
5th Gear Member
GR8 Ride's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brampton
Posts: 948
Send a message via ICQ to GR8 Ride
Originally posted by MorningCruiser
And I know a lot about cars, and a lot about their classes. CL65 will come to north america (actually, I believe there are two in LA and four in detroit, not on the dealer's lot either), it's simply a matter of money.

Oh and as a joke, most old muscle cars came as automatics primarily, and I'm willing to bet they could kick the crap out of a similarly priced BMW In a straight line... of course.

And if your lack of knowledge about cars remark was in reference to my track/skidpad remarks, try it yourself.

Horsepower is a byproduct of torque and gearing, acceleration is also a byproduct of torque and gearing. Speed is a byproduct of horsepower. Cornering ability is a byproduct of steering design, vehicle weight and driver skill (simply put). If you can name a single race track where they have ten turns in rapid succession (back and forth) where the track is only one highway lane wide, I'll give you $10.

I also agree that the CSL is ridiculous (like I said, I think the E46 M3 is BMWs attempt at making a performance car out of a boat/pig/paperweight) in price for what you get. "Look it's an M3, with a lightweight roof, a useless trunk, and lighter wheels coupled with a cute trunklid made out of a saturn's doors!" Essentially...
Ok, I can only let this crap go on for so long before I must inject some sense (and some experience) into the discussion.

One, HP has absolutely NOTHING to do with gearing....take a basic class in physics before you start spouting off crap on the internet like every other 14 year old out there. I'll smack Jon down when he makes bone-headed claims, but he's at least willing to learn, and has largely gotten his s**t together lately.

I could tear apart the rest of your claims in that mere paragraph alone, but I'll pretty much guarantee that you're nothing but a teenager who's in love with Mustangs, and really knows jack about an M3, or driving on the racetrack for that matter. Try it sometime, you might learn something. Your comments on cornering ability were particularly get to work on studying vehicle design and dynamics.

Two, the claims you're making about the Cobra vs the M3 are ridiculous....have you driven either, and especially, have you driven either ON A RACE TRACK? This coming from a guy who lives in Calgary, with a single, modified drag strip turned road course? (Race City Speedway). Yes, been there, done that, grew up there, threw out all the T-Shirts.

Laptimes are a function of a HUGE number of things, and can't be accurately summed up by comparing skidpad and slalom numbers, combined with 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. Given equally competent drivers, the Cobra will get it's ass handed to it on the race track, even a high horsepower track like Mosport.

A couple of problems with the Mustang's suspension design, which translates directly into cornering ability, and the ability to carry speed through the corners.

One, it's a hacked McStrut up front, with the spring being inboard of the shock. Also, the front center of gravity is sigificantly higher than the roll center...when you lower the car, you can actually lower the Mustang's roll center to BELOW THE GROUND. This means you get massive body roll in the front end, and severe camber changes as the suspension loads up on one side or the other. So, you compensate for this by upping the spring rates, which causes the front end to push, or understeer. Which means you need to back out of the throttle to get the pig to turn-in.

Two, even though it has an independent rear suspension, it's basically a bolt-on unit for the solid axle that's been used since the Ford Fairmont days. It's still subject to some of the bind that has plagued the Mustang since 1978, and still has a center of gravity that is WAY up in the air.

Three, the Mustang weighs in about 3800 lbs, in Cobra trim. It's about 400 lbs more than the M3, and on the racetrack, MASS is the enemy.

Four, the Cobra brakes, while *ok*, basically suck. Some decent pads make it a bit better, but they don't hold up well to track abuse, largely due to the excessive weight the Mustang carries around.

Five, steering feedback. The Mustang uses a loose rag joint type lower steering shaft, which provides minimal steering feedback to the driver. This also contributes heavily toward poor corner entry, as the driver can't *feel* where the car is, and what it's doing.

Six, caster, and bumpsteer. Sure, one can install caster / camber plates into the Mustang in an effort to get more caster, and thus some more steering feedback, but once you do, you develop a bumpsteer problem on the front end. It can be solved, but you're going after-market to do it. I believe you were suggesting a stock to stock comparison.

Seven, camber curves. The front camber curve on the Mustang (because of the hacked McStrut) is terribly. The car actually gains positive camber when the suspension loads up, meaning that you need to dial in a TON of negative camber when unloaded. All of this affects both straight line stability and cornering ability.

So, care to bring any tech to dispute any of this, or are you merely going to shut up about the Mustang clobbering the M3 on the racetrack?

And would I rather have an E30 M3 than an E36 or E46 M3? Nope....given the money to build a racecar to suit my needs (let me see...oh yes, I've already done that an M3....probably doing it again....TO A MUSTANG). So, I know a little bit about what it takes to make either car handle, and while the Mustang might have a cheaper entry price, it's going to take a bunch more money to get it to handle anywhere even close to the BMW.

I'm not really an asshole, I just play one on the Internet
GR8 Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 03:03 PM   #64
Southern Beirut
Bavaria's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,436
Send a message via MSN to Bavaria
Bavaria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 07:57 PM   #65
SickFinga's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Location:
Posts: 17,230
SickFinga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 08:07 PM   #66
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,718
Wow, major ownage. I wish I knew this stuff.
mkgino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 08:33 PM   #67
Average Homeboy
UncleJ's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario.
Posts: 2,148
Originally posted by mkgino
Wow, major ownage. I wish I knew this stuff.
Originally Posted by 328PWR
Double layer that sucker.

Maxbimmer gangbang.. cmon peoples!!! throw some high fives, slap dinks together and take turns!!
UncleJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 09:29 PM   #68
Kurt Schneller
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: South Africa
Posts: 392
bwhahahaha, Pat, You just made my day, I am saving this to my drive

I'l make a better one later...
Kurt Schneller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 09:31 PM   #69
6th Gear Member
sonny's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: *
Posts: 1,893
Without a doubt, the M3.
sonny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 10:13 PM   #70
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,375
A true comparison would be between the Dinan M3 and the Cobra. Which one would win in that case???? um Dinan M3!!!
No it wouldnt. if you wanna go to aftermarket enhancments, than the Dinan M3 would be a competitor to the SALEEN tuned Mustang.
ROCKETMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 11:38 PM   #71
6th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie/Oakville
Posts: 2,003
Send a message via AIM to BMW_M52_M20 Send a message via Yahoo to BMW_M52_M20
Well, I knwo the regualr mustangs have been using the same suspension set up since the 70' joke, road and track said it gets and upgrade for the 04/05 mustang.

I have been in the 4.6L 2000 GT, and I felt very uneasy on the turns.
Past: 1998 323is (E36)
1986 325e (E30)

Present: 1997 Jetta GLX VR6
2004 325iT (E46) (pops)
BMW_M52_M20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 11:43 PM   #72
6th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie/Oakville
Posts: 2,003
Send a message via AIM to BMW_M52_M20 Send a message via Yahoo to BMW_M52_M20
Originally posted by MorningCruiser
I'm gonna get flamed out the behind for this but on the track the cobra would walk on the M3.

Even if it couldn't keep up in corners (though I'd put money on it that it can), as soon as it's outta the corner it's for 400ft-lbs of torque and 400hp to push it past the M3.

Be honest now, American cars don't handle nearly as bad as everyone makes them out to. I'd take an M over a Cobra, but I'd still get my ass handed to me by a Cobra.

I will for sure get flamed for this remark: An M3 is not king **** of the car world. To be honest, it's not even king **** of the euro world. BMW owners need to pull their heads out of the sand and realise that the M3 really isn't quite so "high in the sportscar world" that the majority of BMW owners seem to think it is. Yes, it handles well, yes, it accelerates well, but it is by no means a top performer, especially for it's new car pricerange. And before anyone touts remarks of class and prestige try to remember this is about performance, not which is more likely to get you laid (I think a cobra would out here anyways ).

With that said, I love BMWs.
100bhp per litre? 3.3L, inline 6, flat tourque curve, one of the fastest production cars, and praised by all people who drive them? I think that is a damn amazing car.
Past: 1998 323is (E36)
1986 325e (E30)

Present: 1997 Jetta GLX VR6
2004 325iT (E46) (pops)
BMW_M52_M20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 11:56 PM   #73
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oakville/Kingston Ontario
Posts: 161
Send a message via ICQ to Jammasterj
Sorry guys I meant to compare the dinan M3 to the was just late and I was quite tired....

The dinan M3 does have a few major upgrades if you go with the S2 package:
Stage 4 Engine Software; High Flow Cold Air Intake/Air Mass Meter Assembly; Free Flow Exhaust; High Flow Throttle Bodies; Strut Tower Brace; Shock Tower Brace; Stage 2 Suspension System; 3.91 Limited Slip Differential; Signature Series Floor Mats; Dinan Deck Lid Badge and Serial Numbered Dinan-S2 Plaque.

That will give you a meaty 30 more hp and 21 more lb/ft of torque.
Peak Horsepower …………………..361 bhp @ 7900 rpm
Peak Horsepower Gain.............29 bhp @ 7500 rpm
Peak Torque ………………………….282 lb/ft @ 5000 rpm
Peak Torque Gain...................21 lb/ft @ 7500 rpm

Enough to make you wet your pants...
Not to mention the fact that you car will be dinan registered and the value will increase substantially

and btw...Pat everything about the mustang you said was true, we just needed someone to say it
Jammasterj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 12:51 AM   #74
6th Gear Member
crazyvadim's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 2,167
Send a message via AIM to crazyvadim
I think Pat officially closed this discussion.
crazyvadim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 01:01 AM   #75
1800+ HP Driveway
tlaselva's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Woodbridge
Posts: 2,695
Send a message via MSN to tlaselva
Thanks for chiming in Pat.

Good to hear from someone who know's what they're talking about.
2011 X5 M-Sport 3.5i

2010 Dodge Ram Hemi Sport

2010 GSX-R 750

2003 C5 Z06
LS7 427CI w/ECS Novi 2000 : Caravaggio Widebody and Full Leather & Alcantra Interior
903rwhp/815rwtq : 10.3@152mph
tlaselva is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Maxbimmer Copyright 2001 - 2018