Click to go to Forum Home Click to go to maXbimmer Home

Go Back   maXbimmer Forums > General > General Discussion
User Name

Welcome to!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-29-2003, 03:04 AM   #1
Econobimmer Racing
BMW_7's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kiev
Posts: 8,364
Send a message via AIM to BMW_7 Send a message via MSN to BMW_7
Red face BBC picks their favourite M!

Nice read!

I wonder where the 2002 turbo is??

Helprace, a helpdesk & community platform

Last edited by BMW_7; 12-29-2003 at 03:09 AM.
BMW_7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 03:33 AM   #2
Posts: n/a
awesome link
I don't like the results tho
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 03:35 AM   #3
Average Homeboy
UncleJ's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario.
Posts: 2,149
M3 CSL is so awsome.
Originally Posted by 328PWR
Double layer that sucker.

Maxbimmer gangbang.. cmon peoples!!! throw some high fives, slap dinks together and take turns!!
UncleJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 03:50 AM   #4
7th Gear [SMG III] Member
Understated's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: location location
Posts: 9,955
OUUUU.....M5 *drool*
Understated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 04:12 AM   #5
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 151
Trogdor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 04:50 AM   #6
Posts: n/a
Those results are a joke, a M3 CSL and M3 are so close, its not worth the extra 40% for the car, that E34 M5 should have been higher, the evo should have been higher and the m1 should have been higher
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 05:22 AM   #7
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: HK
Posts: 2,538
then what should have been LOWER then? the result seems pretty fair to me, i'm sure the drivers/raters know more than you and me combined.

Wrangler Sahara 2015
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Alezone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 09:20 AM   #8
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,692
I agree with the results. Best technology, styling and performance won, IMO of course
mkgino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 09:53 AM   #9
SickFinga's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Location:
Posts: 16,734
BMWF1, M1 was a disaster as a production car, why should it be higher?
SickFinga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2003, 05:40 PM   #10
Posts: n/a
it was never ment to be a great production car, they should compare the cars and rate the car at when it was produced, the m1 was ahead of its time in everything, and it should have recieved points for that, well ofcourse if you compare it to a brand new M3 it will lose points on design and aerodynamics. common now
  Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Maxbimmer Copyright 2001 - 2015