 |
12-29-2003, 02:04 AM
|
#1
|
|
Econobimmer Racing
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8,361
Car: civic & corolla
|
BBC picks their favourite M!
__________________
Vitaliy
2000 Audi A8 SWB Silver/Black
1992 BMW 525iT/5 White/Blue [MPars, HIDs, cargo net]
1989 525i [scrapped]
1995 BMW 318i DASC [sold]
Last edited by BMW_7; 12-29-2003 at 02:09 AM.
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 02:33 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guest
|
awesome link
I don't like the results tho  
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 02:35 AM
|
#3
|
|
Average Homeboy
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario.
Posts: 2,175
Car: 1999 328i
|
M3 CSL is so awsome.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 328PWR
Double layer that sucker.
Maxbimmer gangbang.. cmon peoples!!! throw some high fives, slap dinks together and take turns!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 02:50 AM
|
#4
|
|
7th Gear [SMG III] Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: location location
Posts: 9,989
Car: back in mother russia, cars drive YOU
|
OUUUU.....M5 *drool*
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 03:12 AM
|
#5
|
|
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 153
Car: Nissan Sentra, BMW 328i
|
predicatable 
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 03:50 AM
|
#6
|
|
Guest
|
Those results are a joke, a M3 CSL and M3 are so close, its not worth the extra 40% for the car, that E34 M5 should have been higher, the evo should have been higher and the m1 should have been higher
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 04:22 AM
|
#7
|
|
Capitalism
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: HK
Posts: 2,544
Car: 981
|
then what should have been LOWER then? the result seems pretty fair to me, i'm sure the drivers/raters know more than you and me combined.
__________________
/// M3 CAB
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 08:20 AM
|
#8
|
|
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,811
Car: 1997 328is
|
I agree with the results. Best technology, styling and performance won, IMO of course
__________________
 
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 08:53 AM
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Location:
Posts: 16,145
Car: m3
|
BMWF1, M1 was a disaster as a production car, why should it be higher?
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2003, 04:40 PM
|
#10
|
|
Guest
|
it was never ment to be a great production car, they should compare the cars and rate the car at when it was produced, the m1 was ahead of its time in everything, and it should have recieved points for that, well ofcourse if you compare it to a brand new M3 it will lose points on design and aerodynamics. common now
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 AM.
|
