Click to go to Forum Home Click to go to maXbimmer Home

Go Back   maXbimmer Forums > Misc > Off-topic
User Name
Password


Welcome to Maxbimmer.com!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-20-2009, 12:57 PM   #1
bmdbley'sBro
wouldu like some tinfoil?
 
bmdbley'sBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in your attic!
Posts: 4,674
Mother Arrested charged with felony for Blogging About Police



Quote:
'Uh-Oh They're Here'
A persistent blogger annoys police -- and winds up in jail.

COMMENT 88 Comments
Monday, August 10, 2009

A 34-YEAR-OLD woman, the mother of a 12-year-old girl, has been locked up in a Virginia jail for three weeks and could remain there for at least another month. Her crime? Blogging about the police.

Elisha Strom, who appears unable to make the $750 bail, was arrested outside Charlottesville on July 16 when police raided her house, confiscating notebooks, computers and camera equipment. Although the Charlottesville police chief, Timothy J. Longo Sr., had previously written to Ms. Strom warning her that her blog posts were interfering with the work of a local drug enforcement task force, she was not charged with obstruction of justice or any similar offense. Rather, she was indicted on a single count of identifying a police officer with intent to harass, a felony under state law.

It's fair to say that Ms. Strom was unusually focused on the Jefferson Area Drug Enforcement task force, a 14-year-old unit drawn mainly from the police departments of Charlottesville, Albemarle County and the University of Virginia. (Her blog at http://iheartejade.blogspot.com, expresses the view that the task force is "nothing more than a group of arrogant thugs.") In a nearly year-long barrage of blog posts, she published snapshots she took in public of many or most of the task force's officers; detailed their comings and goings by following them in her car; mused about their habits and looks; hinted that she may have had a personal relationship with one of them; and, in one instance, reported that she had tipped off a local newspaper about their movements.

Predictably, this annoyed law enforcement officials, who, it's fair to guess, comprised much of her readership before her arrest. But what seems to have sent them over the edge -- and skewed their judgment -- is Ms. Strom's decision to post the name and address of one of the officers with a street-view photo of his house.

All this information was publicly available, including the photograph, which Ms. Strom gleaned from municipal records. The task force's officers may have worked undercover on occasion, but one wonders about their undercover abilities, given that Ms. Strom was able to out them so consistently. Chief Longo warned Ms. Strom that her blog posts were scaring off informants and endangering the officers and their families, but he provided no evidence. At no point did Ms. Strom's blog express a threat, explicit or otherwise, to police or their sources.

Ms. Strom is not the most sympathetic symbol of free-speech rights. She has previously advocated creating a separate, all-white nation, and her blog veers from the whimsical to the self-righteous to the bizarre. But the real problem here is the Virginia statute, in which an overly broad, ill-defined ban on harassment-by-identification, specifically in regard to police officers, seems to criminalize just about anything that might irritate targets.

It should not be a crime to annoy the cops, whose raid on Ms. Strom's house looks more like a fit of pique than an act of law enforcement. Some of her postings may have consisted of obnoxious speech, but they were nonetheless speech and constitutionally protected. That would hold true right up through her last blog post, written as the police raid on her home began at 7 a.m.: "Uh-Oh They're Here."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...080902126.html
#1 see theres people way worse then me when it comes to having an issue with law enforcement, or just issues in general #2 one of my 'issues' is lack of cameras in squad cars in canada, lack of accountability. Its their word against yours, who does the judge usually side with?

the secret 'emergency' only phone taps -No judicial oversight, nothing- that they've been doing since 99! revenue generation - too many cops writting to many tickets these days.
the war on drugs (pure fantasy speak & im keeping it short) it is by its definition a war against its own citizens - You it kinda sucks living in a world where you more then likely will be questioned about where you're going, what you're doing, until you have grey hair. all because you potentially could be in possesion of some substance deemed 'immoral'

and now the 'evil immorality' thing is carried over into driving most severly with the stunting laws.$2,000 thou to $10,000 thou for 1 of the multiple offences the police can choose from is Draconian in its severity and immoral in its financial devestation to the criminal now made victim! In a truely just world such sever fines should only apply to soccer moms & those that text & drive! and only those that cause accidents.
__________________
bmdbley'sBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 08:37 PM   #2
BMW_7
Econobimmer Racing
 
BMW_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kiev
Posts: 8,364
Send a message via AIM to BMW_7 Send a message via MSN to BMW_7
lol
__________________
Vitaliy



Helprace, a helpdesk & community platform
BMW_7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 08:47 PM   #3
BigD
the misanthropist
 
BigD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: a house
Posts: 6,249
Good, one less psycho able to freely roam the land.
__________________
BigD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 10:13 AM   #4
TNation
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto/Calgary
Posts: 1,908
good work, lock her up
TNation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 10:49 AM   #5
europrince
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North York
Posts: 6,729
I read about this. What a retard!
europrince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 08:04 PM   #6
bmdbley'sBro
wouldu like some tinfoil?
 
bmdbley'sBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in your attic!
Posts: 4,674
^ I dunno guys alot of other peoples thought she'd probably be recieving money

the info she posted was Publicly attained info - p u b l i c - should undercovers have their info so easily attainable that a single mom can out them? and how that translates into a Felony>?

the washington post writer seems to think her freedom of speech rights are being violated..
__________________
bmdbley'sBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Maxbimmer Copyright 2001 - 2015