Click to go to Forum Home Click to go to maXbimmer Home

Go Back   maXbimmer Forums > Misc > Off-topic
User Name
Password


Welcome to Maxbimmer.com!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-30-2003, 07:47 PM   #1
Dave 325i
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: .
Posts: 888
conspiracy theory?



http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.htm...ually_happened
__________________
Dave 325i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 07:59 PM   #2
1BADBMW
6th Gear Member
 
1BADBMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Here
Posts: 1,377
too lazy to read, ........what does it say?
__________________

--> PARTING OUT E21 320 <--
1BADBMW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 08:01 PM   #3
djcontra
Gets Blown Daily
 
djcontra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scarghetto
Posts: 6,129
Send a message via ICQ to djcontra Send a message via MSN to djcontra Send a message via Yahoo to djcontra
I think that article is full of b.s.

but i still dont believe a plane hit the pentagon
the damage just doesn't add up to the size of plane and type of damage that occured.
i still think it was a bomb
djcontra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 08:43 PM   #4
mkgino
6th Gear Member
 
mkgino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,685
Quote:
Originally posted by djcontra
I think that article is full of b.s.

but i still dont believe a plane hit the pentagon
the damage just doesn't add up to the size of plane and type of damage that occured.
i still think it was a bomb
Dont you think the pentagon would be reinforced to something like what happened, explaining why there was only little damage???
__________________
mkgino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 09:35 PM   #5
MP328
Krv Svoju Za Bosnu Moju
 
MP328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brampton
Posts: 2,583
Send a message via MSN to MP328
Quote:
Originally posted by mkgino
Dont you think the pentagon would be reinforced to something like what happened, explaining why there was only little damage???
the pentagon is reinforced, all the walls are solid concrete and .... size ( dont remember how thick) . they had a special the other night on tv. and said also that that exact section was just restored and updated with some more safety features. and was finished only a few weeks before the airplane hit.
MP328 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 10:06 PM   #6
Dave 325i
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: .
Posts: 888
Basically that the WTC was taken out by bombs planted by the government.

They say the plane-bringing-down-the-towers- explanation doesn't fly (pun unintended) because there are no theories that support it. The fires wouldn't have burned hot enough. The towers withstood the impact. Only a controlled demolition would have cause the towers to fall down so perfectly without damaging anything else.

The planes that DID fly into the towers were computer controlled or something. Basically you start with the planes didn't bring the towers down and speculate from there.

No one in the public actually knows for sure why the towers came down. But there are reports that some firefighters heard bombs going off, and there are some anomalies in seismic data.

There are some facts in there that seem suspicious
- WTC ownership change
- suspicious trading of airline stock
- delay in scrambling fighters
- no remnants of a jet in the Pentagon

Who knows?

Who cares?
__________________
Dave 325i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 11:48 PM   #7
mkgino
6th Gear Member
 
mkgino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,685
Quote:
Originally posted by Dave 325i
Basically that the WTC was taken out by bombs planted by the government.

They say the plane-bringing-down-the-towers- explanation doesn't fly (pun unintended) because there are no theories that support it. The fires wouldn't have burned hot enough. The towers withstood the impact. Only a controlled demolition would have cause the towers to fall down so perfectly without damaging anything else.

The planes that DID fly into the towers were computer controlled or something. Basically you start with the planes didn't bring the towers down and speculate from there.

No one in the public actually knows for sure why the towers came down. But there are reports that some firefighters heard bombs going off, and there are some anomalies in seismic data.

There are some facts in there that seem suspicious
- WTC ownership change
- suspicious trading of airline stock
- delay in scrambling fighters
- no remnants of a jet in the Pentagon

Who knows?

Who cares?
This is what people think of when they dont have any time on their hands. But it may be true. One thing to think about is the US could have done this to themselves for a reason to go into Afghanistan, otherwise, there would be no reason to go.
__________________
mkgino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 12:12 AM   #8
Kal
maxRealtor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 3,756
Send a message via MSN to Kal
interesting .. but i'm not buying it
Kal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 01:21 AM   #9
Dave 325i
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: .
Posts: 888
Quote:
Originally posted by mkgino
One thing to think about is the US could have done this to themselves for a reason to go into Afghanistan, otherwise, there would be no reason to go.
That's a good point - but it probably goes way further than just Afghanistan.

Otherwise no would be no War on Terror business, no anti-Saddam all of a sudden again, no "catch bin Laden", no Patriot Act, no office of Homeland Security, airport security, countries all over the world busting up al-Qaeda cells or whatever.

I remember a lot of people mentioning that it was almost like a scripted movie or something in its terror and drama.

I don't think it occurred to anyone that it might actually have been scripted ...

Kinda strange to think back when none of this business was going on - September 10, 2001.
__________________

Last edited by Dave 325i; 01-31-2003 at 01:25 AM.
Dave 325i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 02:14 AM   #10
Furious
BMW again.
 
Furious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,088
very interesting and sick that people think of stuff like that. lots of people died not just in the sept 11th attacks but in the war against afganistan. its not a funny thing. i think that the theory of the planes not being able to bring the towers down in a load. the structural damage of the world trade towers was more than enough to bring down the towers. its like jenga. when you mess with the structural intergity of the building. the remaining sections of those floors which are damaged now has to hold the weight of what ever is on top. especially since those planes basically blasted through to the other side of the building , that dosent leave very many supports..
Furious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 03:07 AM   #11
///Greco540
4th Gear Member
 
///Greco540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 766
This is all part of thebig american polot to control the world. They are trying to police all the governments of the world, putting themselves as the rulers. Why else would they be starting up shit with Iraq, Iran, Afganistan, North Korea. Every country that has been bombed by the US through the united nations was a country that did not abide by the so called foreign plocies of the united states.

The begining of the movie K-19 depicts that the Russian government has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world 2 times over, while the US has enough to do it 10 times over. Who are the US to decide if a country cannot build up its defenses to protect itself from aggressors, even if those aggresors are the US. Do you honestly blame Saddam for building weapons, and building an army? Are the US the only country allowed to spend billions of dollars on defense? Could you imagine if Canada decided to increase its defense budget 10 fold, and started building more war polanes, tanks, submarines. Would we as Canadians become labeled as terrorist for trying to protect ourselves from aggresors. The only thing the US hasn't done todate is picked up a dictionary and read the definition of terrorism. If they did, they would see it only describes themselves.
__________________
//Greco540
'98 (04/98) 540i/6 Biarritz Blue / Sand Beige
Options: 17" Style 32 Staggered / Sport Seats / Xenons / Sport Suspension / 6 Speed / Cold weather Pkg
Mods: M5 Grill, CDV, AE Xenons, Rogue Engineering Octane Short Shifter w/ WSR, Rogue Engineering Performance Transmission Mounts, Royal Purple Synchromax Transmission Fluid, Gruppe M Filter Ram Charger


My Car Site
///Greco540 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 04:59 AM   #12
Autotechnica
BMW Traitor
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Ont
Posts: 4,988
Send a message via MSN to Autotechnica
I find it pathedic that after so many years the American's think that they can still control the world. I don't sympathize with the Americans at all.

Bry
__________________
'02 C32 AMG @ 18psi - Eurocharged custom ECU/TCU, ASP 178mm crank pulley + NW PSK, CM30 i/c pump, NW i/c iso kit, EC i/c, Magnecore wires, NW CAI, SL55 Y pipe, NW ported intake manifolds + gaskets/spacers, NW inconel exhaust manifolds, NW catch can, dual exhaust, H&R sways, H&R coilovers, H&R spacers, Quaife ATB LSD, goodridge lines, EBC yellowstuff, AMG 18" rims, Zeitronix datalogger.

Autotechnica is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 05:39 AM   #13
Furious
BMW again.
 
Furious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,088
Quote:
Originally posted by Autotechnica
I find it pathedic that after so many years the American's think that they can still control the world. I don't sympathize with the Americans at all.

Bry
me being an american. i can agree. in one aspect you have to see that with being the land of the free. certain measures have always had to be implimented to police the matters of the rest of the world. i do believe thought that america takes things too far. the war with iraq is very unnessesary IMO , but on the other hand you have to see that without this force , Iraq could be a potential thread to the free world. if they DO have mobil nuclear and chemical weapons depots than all it takes is one nuke pointed at the upper states and we would all be toast. (fall out and stuff),, were is the line, and at what point is it crossed. i believe that the american govenment will cross it if war is truely declared. this is just some of my 2 or 3 cents.
Furious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 05:49 AM   #14
SickFinga
Moderator
 
SickFinga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Location:
Posts: 16,539
This is BULLSHIT.
1st. I do believe Osama hit dat shit.
2nd. Pentagon doesn't have a lot of damage just because it is samll and hit pentagon with a big plane isn't that easy, so most damage was from debree and other crap.
3rd. WTC felt down because support beams didn't withstand fire that was caused by jet fuel.
4th Russia and US has the same ammount of Nuclear weapons.
5th America is a big corporation, it is not a country.
Bush only has 1 goal. GAS!!
If he was really scared of nuclear weapons, North Korea would be bombed million times already. But it isn't. Why? What Korea doesn't have? OIL!!!
SickFinga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2003, 05:51 AM   #15
Autotechnica
BMW Traitor
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Ont
Posts: 4,988
Send a message via MSN to Autotechnica
Quote:
Originally posted by Furious325is
me being an american. i can agree. in one aspect you have to see that with being the land of the free. certain measures have always had to be implimented to police the matters of the rest of the world. i do believe thought that america takes things too far. the war with iraq is very unnessesary IMO , but on the other hand you have to see that without this force , Iraq could be a potential thread to the free world. if they DO have mobil nuclear and chemical weapons depots than all it takes is one nuke pointed at the upper states and we would all be toast. (fall out and stuff),, were is the line, and at what point is it crossed. i believe that the american govenment will cross it if war is truely declared. this is just some of my 2 or 3 cents.
Mark,

But what gives the American's the right to have nuclear weapons and be able to say Iraq is not allowed to have any? It seems like American's are just bullying Iraq. I believe that Saddam Hoosain will not openly fire on the american's for no reason. He is not crazy like Bin Laden, he does not want to start a war with the Americans. Even though he could do a lot of damage he knows that in the end he will be defeated so I doubt he will try anything. I just don't understand what gives the Americans the right to have so much control over the rest of the world. I realize that is why they formed the UN, but it's quite obvious that the American's are still 100% in charge of making all the decisions. I'm not too thrilled about the time they supposidly accidentily bombed a Canadian base camp and Bush called it a casualty of war.

But I guess since Saddam lost the war he has no choice. But don't get me wrong, I don't agree with what Bin Laden or Saddam hoosain is doing.

No offense to you as an American, but if they stopped sticking their noises into other people's businesses I'm sure there would be a lot less terrorest attacks and hatred towards Americans.

Bry
__________________
'02 C32 AMG @ 18psi - Eurocharged custom ECU/TCU, ASP 178mm crank pulley + NW PSK, CM30 i/c pump, NW i/c iso kit, EC i/c, Magnecore wires, NW CAI, SL55 Y pipe, NW ported intake manifolds + gaskets/spacers, NW inconel exhaust manifolds, NW catch can, dual exhaust, H&R sways, H&R coilovers, H&R spacers, Quaife ATB LSD, goodridge lines, EBC yellowstuff, AMG 18" rims, Zeitronix datalogger.


Last edited by Autotechnica; 01-31-2003 at 06:00 AM.
Autotechnica is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Maxbimmer Copyright 2001 - 2015