You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Nice to hear you vote on issues that matter, not superficial things!
When one of the main issues that matter, is all the money being ripped out of our pockets over and over again! Oh I guess removing the Gardiner expw, from the view of Condo owners downtown are issues that matter!
"To defeat evil, we may have to traffic in evils: indefinite detention of suspects, coercive interrogations, targeted assassinations, even pre-emptive war."
New York Times magazine op-ed piece, May 2, 2004
The dilemmas here are best illustrated by looking closely at pre-emptive war. It is a lesser evil because, according to our traditional understanding of war, the only justified resort to war is a response to actual aggression. But those standards are outdated. They were conceived for wars against states and their armies, not for wars against terrorists and suicide bombers. Against this kind of enemy, everyone can see that instead of waiting for terrorists to hit us, it makes sense to get our retaliation in first.
New York Times magazine op-ed piece, May 2, 2004 http://www.lexinformatica.org/index....56acab57.xhtml
^ another eilite, rich, well educated, F**king pyschopath