Click to go to Forum Home Click to go to maXbimmer Home

Go Back   maXbimmer Forums > Misc > Off-topic
User Name
Password


Welcome to Maxbimmer.com!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-05-2010, 01:53 PM   #1
bmdbley'sBro
wouldu like some tinfoil?
 
bmdbley'sBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in your attic!
Posts: 4,674
Unhappy RCMP -serving warrants in Ottawa for Downloading/uploading movies!?!



so i was just talking with a friend. he tells me a truely horrifying tale showing the police state we now live in! he said he was chilling with his wife watching tv around 10pm. theres a loud knock at the door. he answers it to find a uniformed rcmp & a suite (detective) standing there. they have a warrant - its for Downloaded Movies!!!

the cop in a way admits to him what a extortion mafia racket this is by saying 'hey feel lucky you don't own a house & just rent. cause each movie can be (was it, either) $26K fine or $260K fine Per Movie!!' and went on about how one guy had to lose his home & declare bankruptcy, etc

so #1 everything we do online is monitored #2 you thought speeding tickets were bullshit!? just wait. go find every u.s media story you can ($20K fines for 1 song, total legal rape, etc) - cause we're doing that here now too i guess! I recall hardly seeing Any canadian media coverage of this (in general), perhaps its because people will get upset.
-
-
Quote:
Canada Fast-Tracks Draconian Anti-Piracy Law
Written by Ernesto on May 06, 2010

Following pressure from the US Government, Canada is preparing to ram through a revamped copyright bill that will have disastrous consequences for consumers. The Government is hereby ignoring the public consultation held last year, where many Canadians spoke out against harsher copyright legislation.

In 2008, Canadian lawmakers proposed a new anti-piracy bill dubbed C-61. The plans met great opposition from the public and were eventually wiped from the table later that year prior to the federal elections. Last year, the Government decided to consult the public on what they would want from a new copyright bill.

In that consultation the public made it clear that stricter copyright laws are not welcome. However, it seems that this has had very little effect as Canada’s Prime Minister is about to announce a ‘new’, even more draconian law. Michael Geist, prof. E-commerce Law in Ottawa, described the bill as “the most anti-consumer copyright bill in Canadian history.”

full article with links to bill & etc



http://torrentfreak.com/canada-fast-...cy-law-100506/
__________________
bmdbley'sBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 03:43 PM   #2
SiR
Vtec just kicked in
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TO
Posts: 2,773
that was written in may.... has anything gone through yet?
__________________
-||Old Crayons||-
SiR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 03:57 PM   #3
ScotcH
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiR View Post
that was written in may.... has anything gone through yet?
It's summer ... parliament is out.
__________________
2007 BMW 328Xi Touring, 6 speed
ScotcH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 05:26 PM   #4
bmdbley'sBro
wouldu like some tinfoil?
 
bmdbley'sBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in your attic!
Posts: 4,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiR View Post
that was written in may.... has anything gone through yet?
all I found

Quote:
PMO Issues The Order:
Canadian DMCA Bill Within Six Weeks


Wednesday May 05, 2010

Months of public debate over the future of Canadian copyright law were quietly decided earlier this week, when sources say the Prime Minister's Office reached a verdict over the direction of the next copyright bill. The PMO was forced to make the call after Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore and Industry Minister Tony Clement were unable to reach consensus on the broad framework of a new bill. As I reported last week, Moore has argued for a virtual repeat of Bill C-61, with strong digital locks provisions similar to those found in the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act and a rejection of a flexible fair dealing approach. Consistent with earlier comments on the need for a forward-looking, flexible approach, Clement argued for changes from C-61.

With mounting pressure from the U.S. - there have been repeated meetings with senior U.S. officials in recent weeks - the PMO sided squarely with Moore's vision of a U.S.-style copyright law. The detailed provisions will be negotiated over the coming weeks by the respective departments, but they now have their marching orders of completing a bill that will satisfy the U.S. that comes complete with tough anti-circumvention rules and no flexible fair dealing provision.

The bill is not expected until June, but it will have dramatic repercussions once introduced. First, the bill represents a stunning reversal from the government's seeming shift away from C-61 and its commitment to a bill based on the national copyright consultation. Instead, the consultation appears to have been little more than theatre, with the PMO and Moore choosing to dismiss public opinion. Second, after adopting distinctly pro-consumer positions on other issues, Moore has abandoned that approach with support for what may become the most anti-consumer copyright bill in Canadian history. Third, the bill will immediately impact the Canadian position at the ACTA and CETA negotiations, where the bill's provisions on anti-circumvention and ISP liability will effectively become the Canadian delegation position.

For those wondering what can be done, my only answer is to speak out now. Write a paper letter to your Member of Parliament and send copies to the Prime Minister, Moore, Clement and Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff. No stamp is required - be sure to include your home address and send it to the House of Commons, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A6. Once that is done, join the Facebook group and the Facebook page and be sure to ask others do the same. You may spoken out before, but your voice is needed yet again.


http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5008/125/
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotcH View Post
It's summer ... parliament is out.
true and also true - media didn't even know/report on ontario's eco fee till the 6th of july

Quote:
Perhaps even more important, uploaders, and to an extent, downloaders too (certainly those on torrents), will now be liable. While in the past, the RMCP has stated it won’t pursue uploaders, with new laws come changes in policy for those that enforce the laws. Bill C-61 contains a statutory damage amount of $500.

Limitation
(1.If a copyright owner has made an election under subsection (1), a defendant who is an individual is liable for statutory damages of $500 in respect of all the defendant’s infringements that were done for the defendant’s private purposes and that are involved in the proceedings.

This is a change from the previous wording, which gave the court latitude to drop that $500 to as low as $200.

Scene members, and torrent sites will also find themselves under increasing pressure. Despite claims that most torrent sites are not commercial, it’s not stopped industry associations from claiming they are, in order to get law enforcement action against them. From the act,

Circumvention of technological measure
(3.1) Every person, except a person who is acting on behalf of a library, archive or museum or an educational institution, is guilty of an offence who knowingly and for commercial purposes contravenes section 41.1 and is liable

(a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both; or

(b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding $25,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to both.



http://torrentfreak.com/canada-propo...cy-law-080612/
__________________
bmdbley'sBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 07:46 PM   #5
Blackedout95
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,111
Not the same but I used a torrent to get a Colbert Report I missed, within 2 days Cogeco was contacted by the Comedy Network and was given my info. I was given a first warning. The joke of it, I have almost never used the torrent for anything but maybe a handful of shows over the years, my first and last Colbert Report lol
__________________
E46
Blackedout95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 08:09 PM   #6
SiR
Vtec just kicked in
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TO
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotcH View Post
It's summer ... parliament is out.
good pt
__________________
-||Old Crayons||-
SiR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 10:07 PM   #7
ProStreetDriver
The Real Transporter
 
ProStreetDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 823
Send a message via MSN to ProStreetDriver
so much for a free country or freedom of speech. couldn't this be classified as invasion of privacy???
__________________
1997 BMW 540i/6 sport
1984 BMW 733i E23: Centra staggered 16" rims, Hartge strut brace, Hartge engine
1994 BMW 740i E32: Sold
ProStreetDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 11:14 PM   #8
sirex
King Sirex
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 9,850
Most of the people that get hit with these lawsuits, etc, are people that use public torrent trackers, AS well as those PUBLIC P2P programs such as limewire.
__________________
sirex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 09:21 AM   #9
325isdan
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProStreetDriver View Post
so much for a free country or freedom of speech. couldn't this be classified as invasion of privacy???
What does stealing someone else's content have to do with freedom?
325isdan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 01:53 PM   #10
sirex
King Sirex
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 9,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by 325isdan View Post
What does stealing someone else's content have to do with freedom?

The invasion of privacy is about monitoring the data that enters and leaves your home. Regardless if the data is "illegal" material, without a warrant, they cannot be monitoring your private communication.
__________________
sirex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 03:16 PM   #11
ProStreetDriver
The Real Transporter
 
ProStreetDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 823
Send a message via MSN to ProStreetDriver
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirex View Post
The invasion of privacy is about monitoring the data that enters and leaves your home. Regardless if the data is "illegal" material, without a warrant, they cannot be monitoring your private communication.
exactly! thank you.


same like taking a picture of someone or recording a conversation.
__________________
1997 BMW 540i/6 sport
1984 BMW 733i E23: Centra staggered 16" rims, Hartge strut brace, Hartge engine
1994 BMW 740i E32: Sold
ProStreetDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 07:12 PM   #12
325isdan
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirex View Post
The invasion of privacy is about monitoring the data that enters and leaves your home. Regardless if the data is "illegal" material, without a warrant, they cannot be monitoring your private communication.


Internet companies are all ready aware of when you are stealing illegal content. Are they monitoring your private communications?
325isdan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 07:41 PM   #13
sirex
King Sirex
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 9,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by 325isdan View Post
Internet companies are all ready aware of when you are stealing illegal content. Are they monitoring your private communications?
They are not supposed to monitor it. They are also not supposed to impede it. They are also not "aware" of it. All they see are the packets going back and forth - obviously they can see what those packets are but thats not their job to police the internet. And they are also not supposed to give out any details to the authorities about it - without warrants,etc.

So technically and legally, no they are not monitoring your communications.

Monitoring communications is when you are purposefully looking for something like the police are. When they monitor what you are doing to catch you in the act of commiting a crime. To monitor someone like this you need to have a judge agree to it, you cant do it because you feel like it. If word got out that Rogers was "monitoring" your communications from criminal activity they would be sued and as a corporate entity would cease to exist.
__________________

Last edited by sirex; 09-06-2010 at 07:47 PM.
sirex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 08:10 PM   #14
Bullet Ride
Cars in Perpetual Repair
 
Bullet Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Guelph
Posts: 5,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirex View Post
They are not supposed to monitor it. They are also not supposed to impede it. They are also not "aware" of it. All they see are the packets going back and forth - obviously they can see what those packets are but thats not their job to police the internet. And they are also not supposed to give out any details to the authorities about it - without warrants,etc.

So technically and legally, no they are not monitoring your communications.

Monitoring communications is when you are purposefully looking for something like the police are. When they monitor what you are doing to catch you in the act of commiting a crime. To monitor someone like this you need to have a judge agree to it, you cant do it because you feel like it. If word got out that Rogers was "monitoring" your communications from criminal activity they would be sued and as a corporate entity would cease to exist.
Where does the "notice and notice" program that the ISPs use fall? When they email you saying they know you downloaded Pirates of the Caribbean last week and that you should delete it and inform them when you have done so. There's obviously no legal weight there but they've been doing that for a few years now. Yeah it's not like they are going and telling the Police because like you said that would be illegal. So it's more like technically they are monitoring you, but legally they are not.
__________________
Bullet Ride is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 01:52 AM   #15
SiR
Vtec just kicked in
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TO
Posts: 2,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirex View Post
. They are also not supposed to impede it.
they know what to throttle
__________________
-||Old Crayons||-
SiR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Maxbimmer Copyright 2001 - 2015