Originally Posted by DriveItSideways
It seems that a lot of people think that they have the right to drive on public roads, when in fact its Privilege. If you don't like the rules, don't drive on the roads.
I was so waiting for this fictional statement to be stated.Before I get into it,I would like to ask those who got towed,ticketed,etc. DiD you ask Under what authority were they acting upon?? DID he say he was MTO or OPP.
Did you ask him again under what authority are you acting upon???
DID he next mumble something about the Highway Traffic Act or whatever??
YOUR response should have been:that’s an Act or a Statute, not a law!!!Are you aware gross negligence is equal to fraud????
Next did you ask them flat out, Is this a transaction of a security interest????
If he says I don’t know, then clearly it can’t be a transaction of security interest. You cannot engage in a transaction of security interest in ignorance.
So you say that is fine, so this is not a transaction of a security interest, and if it is, you need knowledge thereof, and since it is not, you will not be generating any obligation upon me to pay or perform, so why am I talking to you??
If they say, yes it is a transaction of a security interest. Your reply, you need my consent for that and I do not consent to a transaction of a security interest.
NOTE: Without ID they cannot give you a ticket.
If they ask for ID, ask them why do I have to show ID, when I am not obliged to have it and you are??
They the police need to show you three things, ID card signed by solicitor general with badge number, badge, and a business card with ID number and badge number all the same or you are not dealing with a lawful uniformed police officer. If he doesn’t have that he is out of uniform.
If the cop orders you to do something it is under protest and duress.
Ask him are you giving me an order
?? Hope he says yes, that makes him liable for a bill.
IN a nut shell everyone towed/ticketed engaged in a transaction of a security interest and gave them permission and acknowledged some fictional law enforced by who??? Everyone one has the right to operate under protest and duress
If you answer to an action taken under protest and duress , it means that you are under protest because you do not agree to what is being said and do not wish to make a contract and duress means that someone if forcing you to do it against your will which makes the document void on its face , or not valid if you use that in connection with your signature.
I bet no one did. RIGHT?? Under protest and duress you have three days under law to void the said document.
Driving IS YOUR RIGHT. Free Use of Public Highways IS YOUR RIGHT.
These are absolute truths without question, held up by courts in Canada and the USA, and fully recognized (albeit not publicly) by police forces everywhere. Every citizen and peace officer should read this page completely. TO TRAVEL IS A "RIGHT," NOT A GOVERNMENT GRANTED "PRIVILEGE", and use of your private automobile on public roads and highways CANNOT be regulated, taxed, restricted or constrained in any way whatsoever whether it be via police roadchecks and traffic stops or by use of such schemes as "mandatory" insurance, registration, driver licensing (contracts), etc.
From the day of the signing of the Magna Carta (the day of the horse and buggy) highways are free to the public. New rights can be granted, but existing rights can not be taken away (this is a basic principle of common law). The Charter of Rights was introduced in 1982. Until then the court relied on the common law (laws inherited from Britain).
• The Charter doesn’t override previous rights.
. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada. (Comment in margin: “Other rights and freedoms not affected by Charter”)
The Common Law:
• Magna Carta – was signed in 1215 when people placed a knife to the throat of King John
• English Bill of Rights
• Absolute Right of Bail
• Assize of Arms
Deceased MP Stanley Knowles declared in the House of Commons about the Common Law:
“It consists of a number of statues, some of them Canadian, some of them pre-1867, some since 1867. After all, Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights of 1688 and many other statues are in effect part of the constitution of Canada”.
Examples of Inalienable Rights
• Personal security. • Personal liberty.
• Right to own and enjoyment of personal property.
The government doesn’t own the highways.
• The government holds the highways in trust for the people. (Example: a trustee is holding your money, but has no jurisdiction to spend it without your consent, even if he thinks it’s in your best interest).
• The rules of Traffic Acts are there to regulate the use of highways in the public’s interest.
But not to destroy your rights to use them.
• Traveling on public highway in your car is a right not a privilege.
• An execution of a right can not be charged a fee.
• Insurance fees can not be mandatory. Advice: Use identification plates for cars that are not tied with insurance .
• Historical note: when insurance was first introduced rates were low. In Manitoba, in past 10 years, motorcycle insurance went up over 288%. The amount of motor-cyclists went down from 20,000 to 5,000.
• Other types of unlawful fees are: parking fees, speeding tickets, charges for registration and renewal of a driver license (they are there to raise revenue for police).
A "DRIVER" is defined in the National Safety Code - the Federal regulations governing commercial operations on Canada's highways - as: "A DRIVER is a person who drives a commercial vehicle".
Any common dictionary will tell you that the word "drives" means directing something or someone to a destination. "COMMERCIAL" means a venture wherein there is a profit, or intended profit. A "BUSINESS" is a COMMERCIAL venture. "MOTOR CARRIER AUTHORITY" is exercised over Commercial TRANSPORTATION. A VEHICLE engaged in COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION is called a COMMERCIAL VEHICLE. COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION is the acting as a third party in the movement of passengers (with tickets) or goods (with bill of lading) in the exercise of the liberty or property right.
Since the exercise of exchanging one's skill and labour for money is a right, the driving of a commercial transportation vehicle cannot be deemed an unlawful act requiring a license. Therefore, the term "driver or commercial driver" can only apply to an "owner/operator".
What, then, is the "CRIME" in DRIVING?
need proof you tube LONDON Ontario Canada
more on the subject
Free-man-on-the-Land, Non-consenting and ungoverned
All Rights Reserved, Exercised at Will and Fully Defended, By the Grace of God, The Rule of Law and the Law of the Land.