Originally Posted by Blackedout95
While I can see how the sentence is excessive he does deserve some punishment, how much I dunno maybe a year or two max.
He enabled drug and money laundering, he certainly shouldn't just be given a warning only.
As far as the gun company comparison, makes no sense at all.
How so? Guns enable killing. Knives enable stabbing. Aren't those people/companies enabling illegal acts?
It's a pretty obtuse statement to make, that "HE' enabled drug and money laundering.