View Single Post
Old 01-12-2011, 08:01 PM   #9
lvan
6th Gear Member
 
lvan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Location
Posts: 5,172
Send a message via MSN to lvan
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.Dot_E30 View Post
IS allows you to use a slower shutter speed(1-3 stops) in low light, to take better/less blurry shots handheld. It's still always better to use a tri-pod, in which case IS does nothing. It doesn't really have anything to do with the camera 'focusing', but since without it, images are easier to blur due to the camera movement and longer shutter, I can see would you would think that.

If you plan on shotting alot in low light, i'd go for the 2.8 non-IS vs. 4f IS, assuming the prices aren't far off.
I think you hit the spot on. Thanks for making it clear.

terrence330, btw isn't F4L non IS a bit old already for someone like me to buy it now? I think it has been on the market for sometime now... I am not too pushy on buying the latest just to brag about it, If it is something that I appreciate it, I just get it. Just to get your input before I wrap it up.
lvan is offline   Reply With Quote