Alpina B5, BMW M5, Brabus E V12 und E55 AMG [Archive]

AMG_POWER

10-08-2005, 11:59 AM

http://redirect.streaming.szm.de/redirect/redirect.php?type=vod&codec=wm&stream=K1/auto/aa011005/m5_b5_e55_ev12_mid.wmv

:eek:

Manimillion

10-08-2005, 02:49 PM

Goodfind :)

I'll take one of the EV12's

SickFinga

10-08-2005, 07:52 PM

EV12 is definitly pimping, but at that price, hell no

BMW_7

10-08-2005, 08:16 PM

Amazing video, A+++++++++++++++++

AMG_POWER

10-08-2005, 08:57 PM

EV12 is definitly pimping, but at that price, hell no

I bet it has nOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo traction until 120km/h +.... But damn looks HAwT. *mw*

BigD

10-08-2005, 11:33 PM

0-100 in 4.4 with a 6.3 liter BiTurbo V12 in an E class? That's ****ing pathetic.

RENNTech had the E7.4RS where they shoved a bored out S600 V12 (7.4 but N/A, "only" 620 hp compared to 640 in that tub of shit) into a 99 E320 and it did 0-100 in 3.9.

AMG_POWER

10-09-2005, 02:06 AM

0-100 in 4.4 with a 6.3 liter BiTurbo V12 in an E class? That's ****ing pathetic.

RENNTech had the E7.4RS where they shoved a bored out S600 V12 (7.4 but N/A, "only" 620 hp compared to 640 in that tub of shit) into a 99 E320 and it did 0-100 in 3.9.

All depends on tyres, weather ,driver,ETC

BigD

10-09-2005, 03:40 AM

All depends on tyres, weather ,driver,ETC

The fastest 0-60 time I've found on the net for the EV12 is 4.2s. Still significantly slower than the E7.4RS. And tire technology has advanced a lot since '99, so if tires are a factor, they should benefit the EV12 numbers.

SickFinga

10-09-2005, 04:10 AM

0-60mph and 0-100kmh is a big difference believe it or not

NOTORIOUS VR

10-09-2005, 09:57 PM

0-100 in 4.4 with a 6.3 liter BiTurbo V12 in an E class? That's ****ing pathetic.

RENNTech had the E7.4RS where they shoved a bored out S600 V12 (7.4 but N/A, "only" 620 hp compared to 640 in that tub of shit) into a 99 E320 and it did 0-100 in 3.9.

I guess you've never heard of Torque eh? :huh?: Since it's turbo and not N/A it's making a lot more torque, which in case you didn't know is a lot harder to put to the ground then less torque. :rolleyes:

BigD

10-09-2005, 10:52 PM

I guess you've never heard of Torque eh? :huh?: Since it's turbo and not N/A it's making a lot more torque, which in case you didn't know is a lot harder to put to the ground then less torque. :rolleyes:

Sorry replied before reading properly... good point... at 740 ft lbs, without 320+ tires it's all tire smoke... still .3s is a big difference, even though it's 96 kph vs 100, and 625 ft lbs vs 740.

Marky_mark

10-10-2005, 02:07 PM

I can't get this video to work i even tryed to down load it

beamerboycsl

10-10-2005, 03:08 PM

not workin?

Marky_mark

10-10-2005, 08:19 PM

Finally the video worked nice video it was cool to watch and to bad it wasn't in english lol i wish i could understand german