PDA

View Full Version : X6-M Revealed ahead of NY Debut


Gamite
04-03-2009, 07:24 PM
http://img.worldcarfans.com/2009/4/medium/3420085.jpg

A tip of the hat goes to Carscoop for getting their hands on these official pics of the mean-looking BMW X6 M ahead of its debut at the New York auto show on April 9th.

The X6 M exudes a certain menace, given it's shifty identity as a crossover/coupe/sedan/SUV, and wears its M badge without reserve. It looks like linebacker, all shoulders.

Both the X6 M and the X5 M, will come with BMW's 4.4 liter V8 power plant with twin-scroll turbochargers pounding out an immense 550 hp. The same engine will also be put to extensive use inside the BMW family, as it will be going into the upcoming M5 and M6 models, or so sources say.

The X6 is a heavy vehicle but the 550 hp will likely bring its 0 to 62 mph (100 km/h) sprint time to below the 5 second mark, as the current X6 xDrive50i, with the same engine dialed down to "just" 408 hp, does it in 5.4.

An M sprucing up for the X6 comes by way of side air-vents, quad-exhaust, newly designed front and rear ends and a set of five-spoked alloy wheels. The interior X6 M will come with a new M steering wheel and instrument panel along with sports seats at the front.

Source: http://www.worldcarfans.com/9090403.039/bmw-x6-m-leaks-ahead-of-new-york-debut


http://img.worldcarfans.com/2009/4/large/3566925.jpg
http://img.worldcarfans.com/2009/4/large/8183.jpg

AMG_POWER
04-03-2009, 07:28 PM
1. awefull gaps, need to be lower

2. i dunno if i like that front, too many holes

3. like the regular 5.0 exhaust much better.

Otherwise its a nice beast... would like to see the x5 version.

AMG_POWER
04-03-2009, 07:39 PM
i think x5 version of it looks better desing wise...and much roomier as well

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/01_x5m_rdspy.jpg

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/03_x5m_rdspy.jpg


I mean x6 looks very sleak... but for some reason on those pics it doesnt look as sleek. Maybe in person it will look much better?

Gamite
04-03-2009, 07:57 PM
I dunno if I like it without the black moldings, looks strange.

Gamite
04-03-2009, 07:59 PM
I mean x6 looks very sleak... but for some reason on those pics it doesnt look as sleek. Maybe in person it will look much better?

yeah going to wait for final official photo's before I make my judgement

SickFinga
04-03-2009, 09:26 PM
Doesn't look good on those photos, but here it looks absolutely amazing.

propr'one
04-03-2009, 09:31 PM
the new benz GL is way nicer.

344i
04-04-2009, 12:00 AM
Want

Gamite
04-04-2009, 04:12 AM
Doesn't look good on those photos, but here it looks absolutely amazing.

LOL using my horrible photoshop?



Ivan, Are you comparing apples to oranges again?

europrince
07-10-2009, 03:35 PM
http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/story.html?id=1776135

Both muscular and graceful

David Booth, National Post


This just isn't right. I'm jamming into Road Atlanta's infamous "gravity cavity" at more than 200 kilometres an hour, the entire car getting seriously "light" over the big hump that drops into Turn 10. First, the slight kink at the end of the back straight loads the outside tires and then, when the road drops out from under you, the car suddenly humps sideways. At 100 km/h, this kind of behaviour would be all lighthearted fun. At 230, it may still be a whole lot of fun, but there's a sense of drama not captured at more sensible speeds.

That sense of foreboding should be dramatically heightened since I'm not, in fact, driving a sports car typical of such race track shenanigans. The real reason the situation needs a massive amount of adjustment isn't that I'm slewing sideways at 230 km/h but that I'm slewing sideways at 230 km/h in a sport-utility vehicle. OK, so it's a sport activity vehicle because that is BMW's affectation for its faux roaders, but the appellation hardly alters the fact that I'm racing around in something with an SUV's profile and a centre of gravity somewhere around my ears.

Thankfully, the SAV I am flinging about with an almost devil-may-care attitude has been thoroughly massaged by BMW's M division. Indeed, without BMW's famed motor-sports division's ministrations, chances are the X6 I'm driving with such elan would have ended up off the race track, say in neighbouring North Carolina. The X6 M is the first offroader to ever receive BMW's "M" badge, a significant fact considering that, not so very long ago, the concept of a high-performance SUV-- sorry, SAV -- was pooh-poohed by the good folks at BMW.

The transformation to M missile is actually quite easy for BMW. For one thing, unlike the M5's V10, which is purpose-built, the X6 M's basic engine -- the twin-turbo V8--already exists in the more basic X6 xDrive50i. BMW massages the big 4.4-litre engine to a staggering 555-horsepower output by re-routing the turbocharger plumbing more efficaciously (both turbos are nestled in the vee between the cylinders where the intake manifold normally resides) and by having both banks of cylinders drive both turbochargers through a set of "headers" that would do any hot rodder proud. That BMW has also turned the turbo boost up to an astonishing 22 psi is both the reason for the crazed power numbers and proof that the company's basic 4.4L V8 is truly overbuilt.

Such techno gibberish may wow spinning propellor types like Yours Truly, but all that matters to the person behind the leather-clad steering wheel is that the twin-turbo V8 delivers its maximum 500 pound-feet of torque all the way from 1,500 rpm to an incredible 5,650 rpm. The sensation is of endless power and, indeed, when you stand on the loud pedal, the X6 M jumps ahead no matter what the rpm.

It might have jumped in even more dramatic fashion did it not weigh in at a portly 2,305 kilograms. Even though that translates into an almost gargantuan 5,080-pound curb weight, BMW still claims a zero-to-100-kilometres-an-hour time of 4.7 seconds, which is way deep into sports car territory. It's scary to imagine what this drivetrain might accomplish in a lighter chassis.

All that avoirdupois has seemingly little effect on the X6 M's handling as well. Oh, sure, the SAV might handle even better were it to shed a thousand kilos or so, but there is truly little to deride in the comportment department. Everyone returned from their maximum adrenaline lapping of Road Atlanta positively amazed at how well the big X6 M managed its high-speed foray. The brakes -- big, four-piston calipers up front -- faded but little, the variable-effort Servotronic steering had plenty of feel and, despite serious attempts at clipping apexes, there was precious little body roll. This last is made all the more amazing since the M's ride is as accommodating as the basic X6's.

Traction was impressive also as the X6 M's big 20-inch wheels wear sticky low-profile performance radials (P315/ 35R20 in the rear and P275/ 40R20 in the front). And even when enthusiasm does get the better of judgment, BMW's stability control system brings the big X6 back into line.

The rest of the M is very much standard X6 save for some optional trim bits such as the carbon fibre-patterned leather surrounding the centre console and inlayed throughout the doors. That means it's roomy in both rows of seats, has plenty of headroom fore and aft and there's a good-sized trunk, though you can't pack luggage as high as you can in an X5 because of that sloping roof. That so much of the basic X6 is carried over is one of the reasons the M's sticker price is an almost reasonable $99,900.

The only thing stopping a complete affirmation of the X6 M's prowess is the ever more resounding question of who really needs an SUV--OK, SAV -- with a coupe-like sloped roof, all-wheel drive and 555 hp that weighs only slightly less than an Escalade? It's a little like watching Serena Williams out-hustle the lithe twig-like figures that make up the rest of the female tennis world; I admire its triumph of enthusiasm over genetics and am amazed how something so muscular can at the same time be so graceful. Nonetheless, I can't help but think that both would be better served if they lost a few kg.

dbooth@nationalpost.com

propr'one
07-13-2009, 01:23 PM
Julian,

No. I'm just trying to leave saying how ugly, overpriced and ****ing retarded this car is to someone else.

Gamite
07-13-2009, 02:17 PM
Julian,

No. I'm just trying to leave saying how ugly, overpriced and ****ing retarded this car is to someone else.

You were comparing a large sized SUV to a sporty crossover. How does that equal what you just said?